|
|
 |
|
|
| |
Biodiversity
From
Wikipedia,
the free encyclopedia.
Biodiversity
or biological diversity is a
neologism from bio and
diversity. It is the diversity of and in living
nature. Diversity, at its heart, implies the number of
different kinds of objects, such as species. However,
defining biodiversity or measures of biodiversity, is not
so simple.
The word biodiversity was first coined by
the entomologist
E.O. Wilson in 1986, in a report for the first
American Forum on biological diversity organized by the
National Research Council (NRC). The word
biodiversity was suggested to him by the staff of
NRC, to replace biological diversity, considered to be
less effective in terms of communication.
The term biological diversity itself, was coined
by
Thomas Lovejoy in 1980. Since 1986 the term and the
concept have achieved widespread use among biologists,
environmentalists, political leaders, and concerned
citizens world-wide. This use has coincided with the
expansion of concern over
extinction observed in the last decades of the 20th
century.
Biological
diversity (in short, biodiversity) has no single
standard definition. One definition holds that biological
diversity is a measure of the relative diversity among
organisms present in different ecosystems.
'Diversity' in this definition includes diversity within
species, among species, and comparative diversity among
ecosystems. Another definition, simpler and clearer, but
more challenging, is the totality of genes, species,
and ecosystems of a region. An advantage of this
definition is that it seems to describe most instances of
its use, and one possibly unified view of the traditional
three levels at which biodiversity has been identified:
The lattermost
definition, which conforms to the traditional five
organisation layers in biology, provides additional
justification for multilevel approaches.
If the gene is the
fundamental unit of natural selection, thus of evolution,
some, like E.O. Wilson, say that the real biodiversity is
the genetic diversity. However, the species diversity is
the easiest one to study.
 | For
geneticists, biodiversity is the diversity of genes
and
organisms. They study processes such as mutations,
gene exchanges, and genome dynamics that occur at the
DNA level and generate evolution. |
 | For
biologists, biodiversity is the diversity of
populations of organisms and species, but also the way
these organisms function. Organisms appear and
disappear; sites are colonized by organisms of the same
species or by another. Some species develop
social organisations to improve their reproduction
goals or use neighbor species that live in communities.
Depending on their
environment, organisms do not invariably use the
same strategies of reproduction, . |
 | For
ecologists, biodiversity is also the diversity of
durable interactions among species. It not only applies
to species, but also to their immediate environment (biotope)
and the
ecoregions the organisms live in. In each ecosystem,
living organisms are part of a whole, they interact with
one another, but also with the air, water, and soil that
surround them. |
Biodiversity has
contributed in many ways to the development of human
culture, and, in turn, human communities have played a
major role in shaping the diversity of nature at the
genetic, species, and ecological levels.
For all humans, it is
first a
resource for daily life, providing
food (crops, livestock, forestry, and fish), fibers
for clothing, wood for shelter and warmth, medication, and
energy. Such 'crop diversity' is also called
agrobiodiversity.
Ecosystems also provide
us various supports of production (soil
fertility,
pollinators,
predators, decomposition of
wastes...) and services such as purification
of the air and water, stabilisation and moderation of the
climate, decrease of flooding, drought and other
environmental disasters.
If biological resources
represent an ecological interest for the community, their
economic value is also increasing. New products are
developed thanks to biotechnologies, and new markets
created. For society, biodiversity also is a field of
activity and profit. It requires a proper management setup
to determine how these resources are to be used.
Finally, the role of
biodiversity is to be a mirror of our relationships
with the other living species, an ethical view with
rights, duties, and education.
See also:
ecotourism,
cultural diversity,
local food.
From the viewpoint
previously defined, no single objective measure of
biodiversity is possible, only measures relating to
particular purposes or applications.
For practical
conservationists, this measure should quantify a value
that is at the same time broadly shared among
locally-affected people.
For others, a broader and
more economically defensible definition is that measures
should allow to ensure continued possibilities both for
adaptation and future use by people, assuring
environmental
sustainability. As a consequence, biologists argued
that this measure is likely to be associated with the
variety of genes. Since it cannot always be said which
genes are more likely to prove beneficial, the best choice
for
conservation is to assure the persistence of as many
genes as possible.
For ecologists, this
approach is sometimes considered inadequate and too
restricted.
Biodiversity is not
static: it is a system in constant evolution, from a
species, as well as from an individual organism point of
view. The average half-life of a species is around one
million years and 99% of the species that have
ever lived on earth are today extinct.
Biodiversity is not
distributed evenly on earth. It is consistently richer in
the tropics. As one approaches polar regions one finds
larger and larger populations of fewer and fewer species.
Flora and fauna vary depending on
climate, altitude,
soils and the presence of other species. For a listing
of distinct
ecoregions based on these distributions, see the
WikiProject
Ecoregions.
Systematics assesses biodiversity simply by
distinguishing among species. At least 1.75 million
species have been described; however, the estimates of the
true number of current species range from 3.6 to more than
100 million. Some also say that the knowledge of the
species and the families became insufficient and must be
supplemented by a greater comprehension of the functions,
interactions and communities. Moreover, exchanges of genes
occurring between the species tend to add complexity to
the inventory.
 | Brazil is said to
represent 1/5 of the world biodiversity, with 50,000
plant species, 5,000 vertebrates, 10-15 million insects,
millions of microorganisms, etc. |
 | India is said to
represent 8% of the recorded species, with 47,000 plants
species and 81,000 animals. |
See also:
biogeography,
Amazonian forest,
species inventory,
extinction.
Ecologists and
environmentalists were the first to insist on the economic
aspect of biological diversity protection. Thus,
Edward O. Wilson wrote in 1992, that la
biodiversité est l'une des plus grandes richesses de la
plančte, et pourtant la moins reconnue comme telle.
Most people see
biodiversity as a reservoir of resources to be drawn upon
for the manufacture of food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic
products. This concept of biological resources management
probably explains most fears of resources disappearance
related to the erosion of the biodiversity. However, it is
also is the origin of new conflicts dealing with rules of
division and appropriation of natural resources.
Economic estimation of
the value of biodiversity is a necessary precondition to
any discussion on the distribution of biodiversity
richnesses. This goal must also make it possible to
determine financial means to devote to its protection.
This new field of study is called:
economic value of biodiversity.
During the last decades,
an
erosion of biodiversity was observed. A majority of
biologists believe that a mass extinction
is under way. Although divided over the numbers, many
scientifics believe that the rate of loss is greater now
than at any time in history.
Some studies show that
about one of eight known plant species is threatened with
extinction. Every year, between 17,000 and
100,000 species vanish from our planet. Some
people say that up to 1/5 of all living species could
disappear within 30 years. Nearly all say that the losses
are due to human activities, in
particular destruction of plant and animal habitats.
Some justify this
situation not so much by a species overuse or ecosystem
degradation than by their conversion in very standardized
ecosystems (e.g.,
monoculture following
deforestation). Before 1992, others pointed out that
no property rights or no access regulation of resources
necessarily lead to their decrease (degrading costs having
to be supported by the community).
Among the dissenters,
some argue that there are not enough data to support the
view of mass extinction, and say abusive
extrapolations are being made on the global
destruction of
rainforests,
coral reefs,
mangrove swamps, and other rich
habitats.
The
conservation of biological diversity has become a
global concern. Although not everybody agrees on extent
and significance of current extinction, most consider
biodiversity essential. There are basically two main types
of conservation options, in-situ and
ex-situ conservation.
In-situ conservation. In-situ is usually seen as the
ultimate conservation strategy. However, its
implementation is sometimes unfeasible. For example,
destruction of rare or endangered species' habitats
sometimes requires
ex-situ conservation efforts. Furthermore, ex-situ
conservation can provide a backup solution to in-situ
conservation projects. Some believe both types of
conservation are required to ensure proper preservation.
An example of an in-situ conservation effort is the
setting-up of protection areas. An example of an ex-situ
conservation effort, by contrast, would be planting
germplasts in seedbanks. Such efforts allow the
preservation of large populations of plants with minimal
genetic erosion.
The threat to biological
diversity was among the hot topics discussed at the UN
World Summit for Sustainable Development, in hope of
seeing the foundation of a Global Conservation Trust to
help maintain plant collections.
See also:
conservation,
seedbank,
IUCN,
Global 200.
Biodiversity must be
evaluated and its evolution analysed (through
observations, inventories, conservation...) then it must
be taken into account in political decisions. It is
beginning to receive a juridical setting.
 | "Law and ecosystems"
relationship is very ancient and has consequences on
biodiversity. It is related to properties rights,
private and public. It can define protection for
threatened ecosystems, but also some rights and duties
(for example,
fishing rights, hunting rights). |
 | "Laws and species" is
a more recent issue. It defines species that must be
protected because threatened by extinction. Some people
question application of these laws. |
 | "Laws and genes" is
only about a century old. While the genetic approach is
not new (domestication, plant traditional selection
methods), progress made in the genetic field in the past
20 years lead to the obligation to tighten laws. With
the new technologies of genetic and
genetic engineering, people are going through gene
patenting, processes patenting, and a totally new
concept of genetic resource. A very hot debate today
seeks to define whether the resource is the gene, the
organism, the DNA or the processes. |
The 1972 UNESCO
convention established that biological resources, such as
plants, were common heritage of mankind.
These rules probably inspired the creation of great public
banks of genetic resources, located outside the
source-countries.
New global agreements (Convention
on Biological Diversity), now gives sovereign
national rights over biological resources (not
property). The idea of static conservation of biodiversity
is disappearing and being replaced by the idea of a
dynamic conservation, through the notion of resource and
innovation.
The new agreements commit
countries to conserve the biodiversity,
develop resources for sustainability and
share the benefits resulting from their
use. Under these new rules, it is expected that
bioprospecting or collection of natural products has
to be allowed by the biodiversity-rich country, in
exchange for a share of the benefits.
Sovereignety principles
can rely upon what is better known as
Access and Benefit Sharing Agreements (ABAs). The
Convention on Biodiversity spirit implies a prior
informed consent between the source country and the
collector, to establish which resource will be used and
for what, and to settle on a
fair agreement on benefit sharing. Bioprospecting can
become a type of
biopiracy when those principles are not respected.
|
|
|