Evaluation
You will be evaluated as a group on your blueprints and presentation and individually on your participation and cooperation. Grades will be determined based on the following guidelines:
|
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blueprints |
|||||
|
Completion |
No
blueprint ready for presentation. |
One
or two sketches of design. |
All
three views complete. |
Detailed
drawings of all three views. |
|
| Professional Finish | Convoluted or messy presentation. Difficult to read and understand. | Difficult to read and understand. | Can be read and understood. May include some pencil lines or eraser marks. | Very neat presentation. Easy to read and understand. Free from pencil lines or eraser marks. | |
|
Technical
Content |
Inaccurate
or missing measurements and scale. |
Several
inaccurate or missing measurements and scale. |
Accurate
measurements and scale. |
Clear
and accurate measurements and scale. |
|
| Presentation | |||||
|
Organization |
|
|
|
|
|
| Justification | No justification for choice of design based on each person's research. Displayed no knowledge from individual roles. | Weak justification for choice of design, based on some elements of math, physics, environment, aesthetics. Presented little knowledge from individual roles. | Sufficient reason for choice of design, based on math, physics, environment, aesthetics. Somewhat strong elements of persuasion. Exhibited knowledge from individual research. | Strong support for choice of design, based on math, physics, environment, aesthetics. Very strong elements of persuasion. Demonstrated expertise in each role. | |
| Delivery | Lack of appropriate and technical language. | Spoke clearly and understandably. Used some technical terms. | A fluid delivery was used. Use or technical language. | Very smooth, confident, professional delivery. Skilled use of technical language. | |
| Individual | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |